EFL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD THE INTERACTION IN ONLINE LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46444/wacanasaraswati.v21i1.384Keywords:
Online Learning, Students’ Interaction, Students’ PerceptionAbstract
The spread of COVID-19 across the world influences different aspects of the world, one of which is education. There are many ways the government has done to keep it from expanding through social distance learning, one of which is through online distance learning. This study aimed to identify students’ perceptions of online learning experiences. The research was conducted at SMK CIS Bali with twenty tenth-grade students. Data were obtained using a questionnaire and interview to gather information on EFL students’ perceptions of interaction in online learning. Questionnaires are provided to students using the Google form after all content in one semester of online learning has been completed. The data collected from the questionnaire were quantitatively evaluated and qualitatively described. The findings revealed that students perceived a moderate level of interaction in online learning, but some reasons
affected their interactions in online learning.
Downloads
References
Bakerson, M., Trottier, T., & Mansfield, M. 2015. Assessment in Online and Blended Learning Environments. Information Age Publishing Inc.
Bentley, Y., Selassie, H., & Shegunshi, A. 2012. Design and Evaluation of Student-Focused eLearning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(April 2017), 2–5. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ969431
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. 2015. Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers and Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
Candiasa, I. 2010. Statistik Univariat dan Bivariat disertai aplikasi SPSS. Unit Penerbitan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Creswell, J. W. 2007. An Introduction to Mixed Methods Office of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. 1999. Critical Inquiry in a TextBased Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. 2016. The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments This. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 98–119.
Hamilton, B. 2015. Integrating Technology in The Classroom. Tools to Meet the Needs of Every Student. International Society for Technology in Education.
Hoi, S. C. H., Sahoo, D., Lu, J., & Zhao, P. 2018. Online learning: A comprehensive survey. SMU Technical Report, 1, 1–100.
Jaggars, S. S., Edgecombe, N., Stacey, G. W., & Columbia University, C. C. R. C. 2013. Creating an Effective Online Instructor Presence. Community College Research Center, Columbia University, April. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED542146&site=ehost-live
Karunia, A. M., Pratama, A. M., Catriana, E., Ulya, F. N., Safitri, K., Fauzia, M., Ramli, R. R., Setiawan, S. R. D., Mukaromah, V. F., Sukmana, Y., & Auliani, P. A. 2020. Bersiap Tameng Ekonomi untuk Dampak Wabah Corona... Kompas.Com. https://jeo.kompas.com/bersiap-tameng-ekonomiuntuk-dampak-wabah-corona
Surat Edaran Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Kemendikbud) Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi No. 1 Tahun 2020, 2020. Surat Edaran Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Kemendikbud) No. 4 Tahun 2020, 2020.
Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., & Rhame, S. 2020. A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 0(0), 1–7. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592
Lin, E., & Lin, C. H. 2015. The Effect of Teacher Student Interaction on Students‘ Learning Achievement in Online Tutoring Environment. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, 22(22), 19–22.
Martin, L., & Tapp, D. 2019. Teaching with Teams: An introduction to teaching an undergraduate law module using Microsoft Teams. Innovative Practice in Higher Education Journal, 3(3), 58–66.
Nguyen, T. 2015. The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309–319.
Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Faklevi, M., Mufid, A., Agistiawati, E., Cahyono, Y., & Suryani, P. 2020. Impact of work from home (WFH) on Indonesian teachers’ performance during the COVID- 19 pandemic: An exploratory study. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(05), 6235–6244.
Rojabi, A. R. 2020. Exploring EFL Students’ Perception of Online Learning via Microsoft Teams: University Level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163–173.
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2349
Shearer, R. L. 2003. Interaction in distance education. Atwood Publishing.
Temaja, I G. B. W. B. 2017. E-Matching Game in Teaching English for Young Learners. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences (3)1, 67-79.
Tinto, V. 2009. Taking student retention seriously: Rethinking the First Year of University. ALTC FYE Curriculum Design Symposium, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, February 5, 2009, 1–8. http://survey.csuprojects.org/uploads/a-/nu/anuQmE5d6vFwnkDnNNn7Q/Tinto-re-Taking-Student-RetentionSeriously.pd