-
CITATION
Articles
Upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme dengan Pendekatan pemecahan Masalah pada Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri 1 Apuan Tahun Pelajaran 2022/2023
Usage Statistics
Downloads
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Views
Abstract
This research was motivated by the low activity and learning achievement in mathematics of class VI students at SD Negeri 1 Apuan, academic year 2022/2023. To overcome this problem, research was carried out by applying the constructivist learning model. This research aims to increase student activity and learning achievement at the school. By implementing classroom action research which was carried out in two cycles. Data about student learning activities was collected using observation sheets, while data on student learning achievement was collected using learning achievement tests. The results of this research indicate that there has been an increase in learning activities in class VI students at SD Negeri 1 Apuan. In the initial reflection, student learning activity was 1.52 which was classified as less active. In cycle I, there was an increase in the average score of student learning activities by 2.26, which was classified as quite active. Meanwhile, in cycle II the average score for student learning activities was 3.33, which was classified as active. The average score of student learning achievement in the initial reflection was 65.74. In cycle I the average score of student learning achievement increased to 72.61, while from cycle I to cycle II it increased by 8.48 to 81.09. It was concluded that the application of the constructivist learning model through a problem-solving approach could increase the activity and mathematics learning achievement of class VI students at SD Negeri 1 Apuan, academic year 2022/2023. From the results of this research, it is recommended that teachers apply this learning model so that the concepts and learning materials can be easily accepted and understood by students.
References
A. Chaedar Alwasilah. 2007. Contextual Teaching & Learning: Menjadikan
Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Bandung :
MLC.
Adminspssstatistik “Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas dengan SPSS”. Diakses pada tanggal 25 Februari 2017 dari www.spssstatistik.com/uji-validitas-dan-reliabilitas-dengan-spss/
Candiasa, I Made. 2010. Statistik Univariat dan Bivariat Disertai Aplikasi SPSS. Singaraja : Unit Penerbitan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Depdiknas 2006. Pendekatan Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching snd Learning). Jakarta: Dirjen Dikdasmen.
Dewin, “Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Matematika”. Diakses pada tanggal 14 April 2016. http://dewin221106.blogspot.com/2009/11/ pendekatan-konstruktivisme-dalam.html?m=1.
Haryadi, Dedi. 2006. Modul Matematika. Jakarta : Yudhistira.
Melly, “Hakikat Dan Makna Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Matematika”. Diakses pada tanggal 16 Mei 2016. http://irzal.blogspot.com/2011/01.html
Putra Adnyana, Gede. “Perbedaan Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme dan Behaviorisme. Diakses pada tanggal 14 April 2016 dari http://blog.uninmalang.ac.id/jokopurwanto/2011/03/17.html
Rloud ”Rata-Rata Aktivitas Belajar Siswa”. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2016. http://x5classroom.blogspot.com/2012/03/html
Shvoong, ”Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah”. Diakses pada tanggal 14 April 2016. http://id.shvoong.com/writing-andspeaking/ presenting/2063169.html.
Siana, ”Tahap Perkembangan Kognitif Piaget”.Diakses pada tanggal 16 Mei 2016.
www.asikbelajar.com/2013/01/ piaget-tahap-operasional-konkret
Slameto, “Hubungan Aktivitas Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar”. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2016. http://www.masbied.com/search/hubungan-aktivitas-belajar-dengan-hasil-belajar.
Suparno, Paul. 2001. Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogayakarta: Kanisius.
Trianto, 2009. Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme. Surabaya: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Bandung :
MLC.
Adminspssstatistik “Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas dengan SPSS”. Diakses pada tanggal 25 Februari 2017 dari www.spssstatistik.com/uji-validitas-dan-reliabilitas-dengan-spss/
Candiasa, I Made. 2010. Statistik Univariat dan Bivariat Disertai Aplikasi SPSS. Singaraja : Unit Penerbitan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Depdiknas 2006. Pendekatan Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching snd Learning). Jakarta: Dirjen Dikdasmen.
Dewin, “Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Matematika”. Diakses pada tanggal 14 April 2016. http://dewin221106.blogspot.com/2009/11/ pendekatan-konstruktivisme-dalam.html?m=1.
Haryadi, Dedi. 2006. Modul Matematika. Jakarta : Yudhistira.
Melly, “Hakikat Dan Makna Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Matematika”. Diakses pada tanggal 16 Mei 2016. http://irzal.blogspot.com/2011/01.html
Putra Adnyana, Gede. “Perbedaan Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme dan Behaviorisme. Diakses pada tanggal 14 April 2016 dari http://blog.uninmalang.ac.id/jokopurwanto/2011/03/17.html
Rloud ”Rata-Rata Aktivitas Belajar Siswa”. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2016. http://x5classroom.blogspot.com/2012/03/html
Shvoong, ”Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah”. Diakses pada tanggal 14 April 2016. http://id.shvoong.com/writing-andspeaking/ presenting/2063169.html.
Siana, ”Tahap Perkembangan Kognitif Piaget”.Diakses pada tanggal 16 Mei 2016.
www.asikbelajar.com/2013/01/ piaget-tahap-operasional-konkret
Slameto, “Hubungan Aktivitas Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar”. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2016. http://www.masbied.com/search/hubungan-aktivitas-belajar-dengan-hasil-belajar.
Suparno, Paul. 2001. Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogayakarta: Kanisius.
Trianto, 2009. Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme. Surabaya: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Article Metrics
Keywords
#Constructivism Learning Model, Problem Solving, Learning Activities, Learning Achievement
citation
visitor_counter
support by
petalokasi
journal_template
crossref_member
Current Issue
indexing
-
INDEXING
-
